|
|
 |
|
¡¡ |
|
¡¡ |
|
|
|
¡¡ |
HOME > ÇÐȸ°£Ç๰ >
¿ë¾î»çÀü |
|
Á¦¸ñ |
Recent Trends of Leprosy Patients in Dermatologic Clinics (1976¡1979) |
|
|
|
|
ÀúÀÚ |
Joon Young Song, Eui Soo Park, Soon Bong Suh, Ki Sug Suh, Young Ma Hah, Jae Gyung Sohn, Ki Hong Kim, Nan Hee Kim |
¼Ò¼Ó |
|
|
|
³âµµ |
1981 |
±Ç |
14 |
|
|
È£ |
1 |
¹øÈ£ |
|
|
|
½ÃÀÛÆäÀÌÁö |
33 |
³¡ÆäÀÌÁö |
38 |
|
|
÷ºÎ |
|
|
|
¿ä¾à |
There are many ways to detect leprosy patients but the most common and recommended way is through the out-patient skin clinics. We hope very much that the time will come when both leprosy patients and other patients can be treated freely at the same clinic. Only through educating and enlightening the public regarding leprosy can this be done. In order to conduct further study on this problem, a report was published on ¡°The Significance of Seeing Dermatology Out-Patients with the Purpose of Detecting Leprosy Patients.¡± Following this report continued research was also conducted for the past 4years, from 1976 to 1979, at Keimyung Presbyterian Medical Center, Kyung-book Medical Hospital, Fatima Clinic-Department of Dermatology, Catholic Skin Clinic in Chilgok and the Leprosy Mission. Of 114,496 patients who visited the hospitals and clinics for the past four rears, 776 patients were diagnosed as having leprosy. The following results have been obtained after having studied the frequency of cases, type of leprosy, age distribution and seasonal distribution conducted among 776 patients: 1. The total number of patients seen at the out-patient clinics was 114,496 and of these patients, 776 were diagnosed as having leprosy. The ratio of the leprosy patients was 5.13 : 1000. 2. Annual statistics have shown a decrease in the number of leprosy patients. 3. The frequency of cases among males and females was 1.8 : 1. 4. The type of leprosy in order of frequency was L Type, T Type, B Group and I Group. 5. By seasonal distribution 35.6% of the cases occurred in the spring, 24.5% in the winter, 23.7% in the summer and 16.3% in the fall. 6. By age distribution, 22.7% were between 40¡50 years of age, 22.4% between 30¡ 40 years of age, and 22.3% between 20¡30 years of age. |
|
|
³»¿ë |
|
 | |
¡¡ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|